Jump to content






Photo

Patio liquor licences - 30-day wait - not for Elvis?



I was more than a little surprised on Monday to hear Councillor Jeffrey comment that, if restaurant owners put their application in right away, they were very likely to get liquor licences from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission (AGCO) in time for the Elvis Festival, next weekend. Assuming, that is, they wanted to move, or could afford the curbside patio (so far, none have done so).

Surprised because that festival was less than two weeks away from her announcement. AGCO licences usually take at least 30 days to process, usually much longer. Yet she made that announcement July 12, and she had received an email from the BIA, on July 7 that said in part:

"I understand that it is a new licence that would be required and that it would involve a notice period – I believe that would be at least 30 days. There is the possibility for Elvis that they could apply for a temporary extension of their existing permit, similar to what the Post and Tesoro do. We may be past the time for this application as well.

Bottom line is that they are probably at least 30 days from approval – unless Peter may be aware of any fast tracking that might be possible, seeing as these are established restaurants with existing permanent licensing in place.
"

That email or the 30-day approval time were never mentioned in her comments at council, last Monday.

The AGCO's website notes that special occasion permits must be applied for 30 days in advance, unless held indoors:
The AGCO is also responsible for overseeing the administration of Special Occasion Permits (SOPs). SOPs are required for occasional events such as weddings and receptions where beverage alcohol will be served and/or sold. Permit applications must be submitted to a Liquor Control Board of Ontario permit-issuing store 30 days before the event takes place; except for indoor reception events that only require 10 days.

But if this is a new licence, as the BIA suggests, SOP would not apply and a new licence - with its requirement of public notice and a chance to object - would apply.

Smart Serve also notes that a new licence (which the curbside patios seem to require) takes much longer to process:
Anyone who wants a Liquor Sales Licence must apply to the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario. The application process takes a minimum of six to eight weeks, and may be longer if there is a public objection to the licence.

Six weeks? Eight weeks? That's the end of summer. I can't see the AGCO changing its rules to benefit the Elvis Festival. That could violate the legislation and would create a precedent for the province. But maybe she knows something the rest of us don't about how the AGCO operates.

Previously, Councilor Jeffrey publicly assured council and the public during the debate on patios that the AGCO would not enforce its rules about alcohol being carried across a public space from restaurant to curbside patio. That has since proven to be incorrect. I suspect this announcement will prove equally erroneous.

Meanwhile, here is what the downtown looked like today (a beautiful Saturday afternoon in mid-July) without the patios and the happy customers they could have served:
Posted Image
Posted Image
And again today, as we walked through the downtown on our usual Saturday morning trip to the Farmers' Market and the downtown, I heard numerous comments from residents about the negative impact of this bylaw.



Only three months until the election and soooooooo many people are talking about the terribly restrictive, unpopular bylaw imposed upon the Town by Jeffery and her followers that I think it is a very good thing. I think a whole whack of people will vote who have never voted before. I think we will end up with several fresh, new, eager councillors at the table who know that the people must be listened too. I hope we have heard the last of Jeffery, Sandberg, Labelle, Foley, and McNabb.
I'm sad that we will get a better council at the expense of restaurant owners and their staff.
I hope we get at least one Ian, possibly two, at the table!!!
Would it not make sense to have a person on the BIA executive that actually owned a restaurant or had some experience in that area? Then that fine body might find itself more embraced by the members who pay what I see as protection fees (extortion is another term that comes to mind) for not a whole lot in return. Prattling gabbers all! Again with Jeffrey and her ilk the saying "shoot first and ask questions later" comes to mind. I am directly affected by this as my wife works in one of the restaurants hurt by this insane omnibus bylaw. It means one less shift a week during the warm months. I will be examining my ballot form carefully this year and making sure none of the joltheads names responsible for this fiasco gets an X next to their name.
I understand that in a move of desperation Jeffery will be making a motion Monday to waive all fees for the downtown this year.
What part of "not putting a patio curbside" does she not understand? Why should restaurant owners invest in new fencing, covered dishes, wet bars, fridges, furniture, umbrellas when there is a very real possibility that the whole ugly bylaw will be reversed by the new and wiser council? All restaurant owners have a business plan that helps guide decisions. They have told council they cannot afford the move. CLEAR??
I also understand that the little ice cream man will put out a curbside patio to show that they do work. Apples and oranges fella. You scoop cones which the customers carry outside to lick. Not like a full-service licensed restaurant at all.
Quick and Dirty. I have to say I agree with all of the above comments.

Before you make such dramatic changes that impact so many in our community, ASK THE PEOPLE THAT IT AFFECTS DIRECTLY FIRST!
Do not just listen and nod. Remember and apply their recommendations where they will make the greatest positive difference.
JEFFERY is feeling her neck.
Her desperation is amusing. Her posturing is sickening.
I will be glad to see the back end of her when she gets 'Kicked to the Curb" in October.

Like McNabb, she must think that all of Collingwood residents have IQ's so low that they won't be able to figure out what she is doing.

I was delighted to see copies of 'Duncan's' last print add ("Why would they listen to after being reelected, if they don't listen now) posted prominently in several other stores on the main street yesterday.

Facebook

Latest Entries

Latest Comments

Daily chess puzzle

Search My Blog

Word of the day

May 2013

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 20 2122232425
262728293031 

Latest Visitors